The spine
Two stories that are secretly the same story. We open with Maria, widen to David, then show First 90 as the line that connects them — and end on the business.
Maria — the new hire
Starts at a home-care location. Unclear training, no safe way to ask. She burns out and quits at week six.
David — the franchisor
Owns the brand across 240 locations he doesn't run. The same poor training bleeds his brand — and he can't see it until it's public.
Maria's burnout and David's brand damage are the same event seen from two ends. Neither can see the other, because the one person who hears Maria — her franchisee boss — is the last who'll pass it up. First 90 closes that gap.
Rob's three flagged components map to: potential losses → slide 4 · value proposition → slide 8 · total market (TAM) → slide 12.
Rob is the main storyteller — slides 1–10 + the close (13). Tobi owns the business block — pricing & market (11–12). Two handoff banners mark the switch with a suggested bridge line.
4
The Cost of the Status Quo
Rob
30s
On slide
Week 6: Maria quits. → home-care turnover ~75%/yr · cost to replace one hire ~CAD $3,200–8,100 · one 240-location brand cycles thousands of hires/yr → millions lost annually.
Say
"Maria is the base rate, not the exception. Replacement cost alone runs into the millions for a single brand — and that's just the measurable part. The brand damage underneath is bigger and slower to show up."
If pressed on the math: ~1,148 hires per 90-day window ≈ 4,600/yr; at 75% churn ≈ 3,450 leave; × CAD $3,200–8,100 ≈ CAD $11–28M/yr. Illustrative, built from sourced unit costs.
Tobi → Rob
Hand back for the close. Rob, the storyteller, brings it home with the Maria/David callback. Tobi's bridge: "The market's already paying for this — Rob will close us out."